Aputure 120Dii Light Review for Wedding Filmmakers (vs Practilite 602)

Aputure 120Dii Light Review for Wedding Filmmakers (vs Practilite 602)

(lo-fi hip hop beats) – Hey guys, my name is Matt Johnson and my current favorite light for lighting receptions at weddings is
this, the Practilite 602. But at $960, this is
definitely not a cheap light and I’ve had a lot of people ask me for more affordable options. Enter the Aputure 120D mark II, it’s $745, it is still quite expensive but definitely a step down in price from the Practilite. Today I’m going to be reviewing
the Aputure 120D mark II and I’m gonna be telling you if you should purchase this
light for wedding filmmaking. Of course, I will also be comparing it to the Practilite 602. And I’m gonna start off this review by spoiling the conclusion. For those of you who don’t
wanna watch me ramble for a while about lights. If you film weddings primarily, I think that the Practilite 602
is the perfect light for wedding receptions. But if you film weddings
as well as other things. Commercial shoots, advertisements,
talking head interviews, YouTube videos, anything else like that, then I would wholeheartedly recommend the Aputure 120D mark II. Wanna know why I say that? Well you need to watch
the rest of this video. Let’s continue with this review
of the Aputure 120D Mark II. We’ll start off in a
bit of a strange place with this review, the packaging, why? Because most of the
lights that I’ve bought, you’re lucky to get
anything more than just the light in the box. When you buy the 120D, you get this swanky hard-sided foam bag, look
how fancy this thing is. It holds the light, the
dish for the front of it, the control box, the
remote, all the cables. I love that this is included
when you purchase the 120D. For comparison with my Practilite, it came in a cardboard
box, with a power cord and the barn doors, that’s it. When I bought the
Practilite, I also purchased a pelican 1450 case with foam to store it. Which added about $125
to the overall price. With a cost of over
$200 more than the 120D, I really wish that the Practilite came with some sort of carrying case. Moving on, let’s talk about
one of the first things you probably noticed
about the 120D, the size. Straight out of the box
at almost five pounds, the 120D is not a massive light but you will need to
make sure that you buy a decently sturdy light stand to hold it. I would also make sure you use a sandbag to keep it from falling over. I wouldn’t buy some
super cheap light stand and expect it to support this light. I will link to light
stands that I recommend as well as all the lights and accessories down in the video description,
next to the light button. Keep in mind that the physical light isn’t the only part of the 120D. You are also gonna need to be able to run a cable down to the not-so-small
control box for the 120D, which is how you handle
powering and dimming the light. Thankfully, it does come with a nice strap that you can use to hang
it from your light stand. In comparison, the Practilite 602 doesn’t require a control box and all the controls are built
into the side of the light, making it noticeably more
compact to transport. You should also know that
this light’s five pound starting weight is not
even its final form. In fact, one of the reasons
people love this light is its near infinite level of versatility. Aputure makes a lot of useful
modifiers for this light and because it uses a Bowens mount, you can actually add a ton of accessories from other manufacturers
to this light as well. This versatility is going
to come at two costs though. First, the 120D really is
going to get significantly larger and heavier when
you add these accessories. Second, this versatility
has a literal cost. These accessories are not cheap, so you’re gonna need to be
ready to spend some money to kit this light out. Straight out of the box,
you get a small beauty dish to put on the front of this light, which leaves the front LED chip exposed. If you want to use this
light to brighten up a reception dance floor,
you are going to need to purchase accessories
to cover up this chip, unless you want to do
deal with wedding guests complaining that you are
causing actual blindness, using this light because it’s so bright. And this is the point
where the Practilite 602 really starts to shine as
a wedding filmmaking tool over the 120D in my opinion. Out of the box, the Practilite comes with a Fresnel lens on the front. It has a beam focusing knob on the back. It comes with barn doors that you can use to block the light from spilling off onto the dance floor and
the light will accept Profoto light modifiers. Oh and you can adjust the color temperature too, which is amazing. Let’s compare these features
to the Aputure 120D. As I said, you do get a
nice big case to store it, with a beauty dish for the front. There is no way you can focus the beam of this light out of the box though. There’s no Fresnel lens either. Thankfully, Aputure makes
an accessory Fresnel lens with a focusable beam you can
put on the front for $120. Want barn doors so you can control the light spill on the dance floor? Those are an extra accessory
as well that sell for $60. Out of the box, the 120D costs $745, whereas the Practilite 602 costs $965. But to get the Fresnel
lens, focusable beam and barn doors, you’re
gonna be adding $180 to the cost of the 120D,
bringing you to a total of $925. Suddenly, the cost of the Practilite isn’t sounding so crazy, is it? There’s a lot more that goes into a light than just the accessories
available for it though. One of the most important
things you need to consider is the light quality. The 120D and Practlite 602 both claim to have a CRI in the high 90s
and I have zero complaints about the quality of skin tones and colors I’m getting from either of these lights. They’re both beautiful in my opinion. Unlike cheaper LED lights
that I’ve used in the past, I’ve not needed to color correct out weird green or magenta shifts in my skin tones with these lights. Light quality is where I will say that the Practilite wins for me, from a color temperature
standpoint though. Having a variable color temperature on a wedding day where
I can dial in my light to match the color temperature of a room is so helpful and I do not
want to discount that fact. That said though, having a
high quality daylight balance light like the 120D is
not the end of the world if you’re filming a wedding. You could add some color
gels if you needed to and I shot weddings for many
years using an Arri 150 light that didn’t have a
variable color temperature and it still worked great. The 120D’s color may not
be 100% ideal for a wedding but if you find yourself
filming a lot more than weddings, such as commercial shoots, interviews, talking
heads, anything like that where you have more
control over the lighting than a wedding, I think the 120D, with its greater
versatility of accessories and far greater brightness
will serve you better. Let’s talk about that brightness, which is one of the areas where the 120D is far away my favorite
over the Practilite. From a sheer raw power standpoint, the 120D is significantly
brighter than the Practilite and most other LED lights that
I’ve used for that matter. If you were planning on using the 120D to light a wedding reception dance floor, you only need one and I highly doubt that you are ever going to need to turn it up to max brightness. To measure this brightness,
let’s do something more real world than
pulling out a light meter. I put the Fresnel
attachment and barn doors on the 120D and put both lights approximately 14 feet away from a wall. With both lights dialed into approximately the same beam angle of 40 degrees, both set to the same 5500
Kelvin white balance, not like the 120D has a choice. I even turned the Practilite 602 to its maximum, 100% brightness. I filmed the wall the
Practilite was lighting with my A7S2 and I was able to achieve a proper exposure of 0.0
on the camera’s metering by setting the lens to a 5.6 at ISO 250. I then turned off the Practilite
and turned on the 120D. And with those same settings
of F5.6 and ISO 250, I was able to hit the same
0.0 level of exposure meting with the 120D only set to 55% brightness. What does this tell us? The 120D can hit almost double the level of
brightness of the Practilite. From a light that is still
this comparably small, that is very impressive. Now I do want you to be
aware that the Practilite has a boost mode that
boosts brightness by 140% but that is at 4500 Kelvin
and this is only available when the light is plugged in to AC power. Because I prefer to avoid
using cords that people could trip on, I love battery power so I couldn’t use boost mode anyways. When I was doing my brightness testing, I noticed that the Practilite was able to focus its beam noticeably
wider than the 120D. According to its specs, the Practilite has a 15 to 80 degree beam angle, versus the 120D’s 12 to
40 degree beam angle. The Practilite’s beam
can go twice as wide, so if you need to put your Practilite up against the edge of a dance floor because the room is so
small, you are still gonna be able to light
the entire dance floor. Matt, does this mean that the 120D sucks for lighting a reception dance floor? Not at all but this does mean that you may need to set up further away from the dance floor to
get the beam wide enough to light the whole floor. Thankfully, because the
120D can get so bright, it makes more sense for me to recommend you put it further away
for the dance floor anyways and just turn it up a bit
brighter to compensate. I said I loved using batteries earlier, whenever I use my lights
at a wedding reception, so let’s talk about battery life. I use V Mount batteries
for both these lights. Usually this beefy 150 watt
hour battery from Juicebox. With the 120D set to 100% brightness, you can expect to get 45 to
50 minutes of battery life. Considering the brightness of this light, I’m very impressed that
a battery of this size is even able to power it for that long. Keep in mind also that I highly doubt that you’re going to need
to be powering this light at 100% brightness at a wedding. I also tested the battery
life with the brightness set to 55%, aka the max
brightness of the Practilite. The 120D lasted for over five hours, significantly longer than
the 50 minutes at max power. So depending on the
length of your reception and how bright your light is running, you should be able to
make it through reception with one battery but I
would probably get two just to be safe. In comparison, with the Practilite set to maximum brightness,
I was able to get over five hours of battery life. This is easily enough to get through a full wedding reception
and because I usually run my Practilite at 50 to 60% brightness, I usually end the night with over 75% of battery life remaining. The last thing that we need to talk about is of course, wireless
control of the 120D. In the very nice case
your light comes with, you’re gonna notice this little guy. It looks like a baby television
remote from the 1990s. This remote lets you
turn on and off the 120D, as well as adjust its brightness level. It uses the 2.4ghz wireless spectrum, so it has quite good range
and it should let you control your light, even if you are all the way across a reception hall. On the other hand, you
have the Practilite, which has an iPhone app that will let you adjust your light’s brightness and white balance over Bluetooth. I know some of you are
skeptical about using an app, I was too but having used it for years, it is quite reliable and quite useful. If I had to choose between
using a smartphone app and a remote, I would probably go with the smartphone app actually because I’m guaranteed to
always have it with me, I don’t have to remember to
carry around this remote. You should also know
that Aputure is working on a wireless dongle
that is going to let you control your 120D using the
sidus link smartphone app. That is not available yet at the time of making this video though. So for wireless control, both the 120D and the Practilite give you a good way to wirelessly control your app. I’m gonna say that they
tie in this category. Let’s wrap this thing up. As I said at the start of this video, if you primarily shoot weddings and you want a compact light, the Practilite 602 is
still my favorite choice. With its compact size,
variable color temperature, focusable beam and wireless control, I think it is the best
spotlight you can purchase for a wedding reception. But because the Practilite
is such a good spotlight, it doesn’t feel as versatile
to me in other areas. It does support attaching
Profoto light modifiers but even with a soft box attached, its limited brightness makes
it feel a bit less versatile. So if you film weddings
as well as other things, commercials, advertisements, talking head interviews, YouTube videos,
anything else like that, I would wholeheartedly recommend
the Aputure 120D mark II as the light that you should buy. It is significantly brighter
than the Practilite. Aputure makes amazing lighting modifiers that are easy to use. The Bowens mount makes even more lighting modifiers available to you and I’m kinda in love with the soft light I can get from their light dome soft box. Overall, I think you will get more use out of the Aputure 120D
than the Practilite 602, if you film more than just weddings. For me, I’m still gonna be using the Practilite at weddings but for YouTube videos like this, oo that 120D with the soft box,
that is calling my name. Speaking of calling my
name, I need some music for the outro of this video. If you make YouTube videos
as well as wedding films like I do, then you’re
gonna be highly interested in this video’s sponsor, Musicbed. The weather’s been getting colder now, which means you’re probably hunkered down in your editing cave, all bundled up like I’ve been editing wedding films. And you’re probably gonna need some music to license for those films. I’ve been using Musicbed basically since I started filming weddings and in my opinion, they
have some of the best music from real bands, with real emotion. You’ve got magical bands that make music perfect for wedding films, like CHPTRS. ♪ I’ve been waiting my
whole life for this ♪ – [Mat] Emotive pop
from The Light, the Heat ♪ Forever ♪ – And one of my new
favorite bands, East Harbor, bringing all of the funkadelic vibes to your wedding reception edits. ♪ Right where I belong ♪ – There’s just so much good music that isn’t hard to find
because their search tool has so many advanced features. And they update their curated
playlist all the time, so it’s really easy to find new songs that not everyone else has used yet. Let’s talk about money though. You can license per song if you want to and I used to give them
literally thousands of dollars per year to license
music for my wedding films. But in 2018, they came out
with a wedding filmmaker’s subscription option, which
gives you unlimited music from hundreds of musicians
for one flat yearly rate. Which for wedding
filmmakers like you and me, that is a major win because we have to use so much music in our films. Oh and they created a system called SyncID which automatically removes
YouTube copyright claims for any music that you license through them using your subscription. These songs I’ve been playing samples of, no copyright claims. You and your couples will not have to deal with any music copyright
issues for the wedding films that you upload to YouTube,
that is amazing, sound cool? Okay, use the link in the
description down below to sign up and use the
coupon code MATTJOHNSON, all one word, all caps,
very difficult to misspell and you will either get your first month of a wedding subscription for free where you can download unlimited music or 20% off a single song license if a subscription isn’t your style. Either way, with Musicbed,
your wedding films will never have sounded so good. With that, thank you so much for watching. I hope this video was helpful to you and gave you some great insight into which one of these lights that you should purchase for wedding filmmaking or anything else. It is also a huge help to me if you would consider liking this video and subscribing if you wanna see more videos like this in the future. Do you want to see more lighting videos, possibly cheaper lights
than this in the future? Please leave me a comment
down below and let me know. Thanks so much for watching
and have a good day. (upbeat dance music)

Eugene Islam

46 thoughts on “Aputure 120Dii Light Review for Wedding Filmmakers (vs Practilite 602)

  1. ✍ And now for a Wedding Lighting Haiku:

    Darkening evening

    A bright Aputure shining

    at the perfect light

    Thanks for watching! 😍

  2. I used three 120Dii for my latest short film and I really really LOVED the color accuracy! With the Aputure domes, it was a real pleasure to shoot with. But I do agree on the aspect of using it for weddings may not be the most practical. It's not very 'run and gun' of a setup.
    Also yeah. It's bright. The diffusion on the domes made it look a bit underexposed only to find out my whites were clipped on post. Oops lol

  3. Honestly, I thought these lights were a bit overhyped, but then we got a few in for work and WOW- it’s an insanely great light. I was totally wrong, haha

  4. Matt, you're Arri worked great because it was 3200K, not daylight. Almost every reception I've been to has been below 3200K–that warm orange glow. Using a 5600K key light in a tungsten room is just too weird. Non-variable light is deal-breaker for me at weddings.

  5. his beard is so big that he needs to tilt his head backwards, which may lead to further cervical spine problems
    stay healthy, my dude

  6. Both great lights for sure 👍🏼 I'd go with the practilite for weddings for sure. For a person on a budget (me 😂) I love the boltzen 55w or the nanlite Forza 60. Cheers!

  7. Great video. Just a no re: Practilite case. It came in a precut foam insert. I just kept in in that foam insert and put it inside an older camera shoulder bag I had lying around. Very snug fit with enough space for 2x batts and the cables. See you at Lonely Hearts!

  8. Thanks so much for this review. Practilite 602 info is hard to find and yours is the best. Been rocking my arri fresnel kit for years and I think it's time to upgrade!

  9. How did you make the broll part of the video….the intro has a really cool effect…the slider…cuts…lighting!! Tell us more! Please!!!!

  10. Dear Mat,

    I just want to thank you because you've helped me build a 800$ editing Beast 🤗. Keep up your excellent work. It is really useful.

  11. Have you already seen de Clar Illumi Max 120? It's just a 120D with all the bells and whistles AND it is bicolor at just $250.00. For sale at adorama and amazon. You should check it out.

  12. Hey Matt! Quick question? Have you used the grids on the reflector instead of the fresnel lens? I have the version 1 fresnel and wasn’t too impressed (horrible light leaks and yellow banding on the edge) I tried some 40 degree grids this weekend and they were good but I think I could go a little tighter for controlling spill onto the crowd and only lighting the dance floor.

  13. As someone who does events and commercial work, I'm leaning towards Aputure for all my lights. As you mentioned, there are so many accessories and lights in the Aputure lineup that work well together. Just having one remote for all the lights makes me want to stick with one brand for everything.

  14. Dudeeeeeee awesome video I've been eyeing the 120D for a while now but unfortunately, it's still out of my budget. Do another video with some cheaper options like maybe a beginner/intermediate wedding filmmaker lighting option.

  15. These are great lights. But more importantly, I’m loving the way that the crazy plant/bendy light thing compliments Matt’s lustrous beard!

    And that ‘Cat painting’, so GOOD


  16. Hey Matt I really enjoyed your review but the apurture 120d Mark ii comes with a reflector not a beauty dish, a beauty dish is going to have a rod that holds a flat piece that evenly spreads the light around the beauty dish and making it so that nothing is directly lit but instead reflected and defused before it hits the subject. On the 120 d Mark ii it features a reflector that simply focuses the beam. And I know you don’t know who I am but I have worked as the video editor for fstoppers.com and did the Peter Hurly Illuminating the face, where we went through every profoto modifier and showed the differences. Keep up the amazing work, your Chanel is always one that I get the most excited over when I see the upload notification.

  17. I bought the 3 light kit of the 120dii for when i did narrative work. Now that I've been doing weddings for a while they've just veen collecting dust coz none of my clients have asked for lighting and I'm Australian so weddings at dusk always result in snake bites for people sitting at the edges

  18. I bought the 120dii for commercial used and didn't really know how to film a wedding with because of the harshness of the light.
    I need to buy the fresnel and barn door, i would like to see a video of your setup on a wedding night.

  19. Really awesome review! I gotta say that the Godox-SL60w is far more attractive (price-wise) than the 120d that can use the same accessories! Been really awesome for my weddings this year – only thing is it needs plugged in.

  20. Mattt, you should try the Nanlite Forza 60! It's sooooo small and powerful! I personally own a 300dii but I'd pick the Forza 60 if I'm doing one man band and don't need that much output! One big con though is that it isn't a typical bowens mount but nanlite's own mini mount system. I really wish Aputure would release something in this form factor but at the same time powerful.

  21. Biggest two problems with the Practilite for me is that it's very expensive and not that powerful. My crew and I have about 6 of the Torch LED 250s and love these little lights. The Practilite costs FOUR times as much as these, yet is barely more powerful. Additionally, when you put it in the back of the room, you're not getting much lighting coverage on the dancefloor anyway. The Torches can go anywhere – which makes up for their slightly lower power.

    So, I've since sold the Prac and went with an Adorama CLAR 120 – which is 1/4 the price of the Prac and far more powerful. When I need a "back of the room" light, it's a far better option for us.

  22. Both of these seem really expensive and cumbersome to me for weddings. Honestly wedding receptions are typically so dim lit that any light is better than nothing. I use a 2 yongnuo yn300 iii. Remote control and the battery life is outstanding with np 900 batteries. Lasts for multiple weddings. The apurture and practilite are both better in general and i like the accessories that can be had, but overall they both seem unnecessary

  23. that is way too much for a light, I've been using the YONGNUO YN216 sometimes I only need one light sometimes I need more than one light, I have a total of 4 of those lights, also got the YONGNUO YN600L just in case I needed it. but so far I have not needed it for a wedding. most of the time I found myself only needing one or two YN216 lights.. YN216 are just $50 and the TN600L are $110. to me those The Aputure 120D and Practilite 602 lights are just a waste of money if you only doing weddings..if you get a camera and lens there are very good in low light my cheap flights will be fine.. I have the Sony a7III with the tamaron 28-75 mm lens.. I mean no disrespect Matt you're still my God and hero.. I respect the beard!!

  24. I am using the the Aputure 120d with the focus lens on it for my weddingfilms. Love it sofar. It's also great for the getting ready part with a china ball or softbox on it. I normally try to switch off all ugly lights in the hotel room, but iften times this is too dark for hair and make up. So Before using the Aputure for getting ready, I had to accept mixed lighting, which is super not pretty 😀

    Thanks for the review Matt, love how much work you put into those videos!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *